Real Estate

Former US president Donald Trump leaves the court room of the State Supreme court on the first day of his civil fraud trial on October 2, 2023 in New York City.
Kena Betancur | AFP | Getty Images

A New York judge on Friday denied a request by Donald Trump and his co-defendants for a mistrial in the former president’s $250 million civil business fraud case.

Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron said the arguments for a mistrial were “utterly without merit” as he declined to sign the defendants’ bid for a motion to throw out the case.

The ruling came two days after attorneys for Trump Sr., Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, the Trump Organization and its top executives argued that the case had been undermined by political bias.

The defense lawyers claimed that Engoron and his principal law clerk have “tainted these proceedings” and that “only the grant of a mistrial can salvage what is left of the rule of law.”

But Engoron in Friday’s ruling disputed each allegation of bias, and made clear that he intends to preside over the case until its conclusion.

The lawsuit, brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, accuses the defendants of fraudulently inflating the values of Trump’s real estate properties and other assets for years in order to obtain tax benefits, better loan terms and other financial perks.

In addition to seeking $250 million in damages, James wants to permanently bar Trump and his two adult sons from running a New York business.

Engoron has already found the defendants liable for fraud and ordered the cancellation of their New York business certificates. The trial, which is being conducted without a jury, will determine penalties and resolve James’ other claims of wrongdoing by Trump and his co-defendants.

An appeals court has temporarily paused the process of dissolving Trump’s business entities.

In Friday’s ruling, Engoron went through all of the defendants’ arguments for a mistrial and explained why each was without merit.

The defense lawyers had pointed to articles that Engoron had linked to in his alumni newsletter, claiming they created an appearance of impropriety because they were releated to the fraud case.

Engoron responded that he “neither wrote nor contributed to any of the articles on which defendants focus, and no reasonable reader could possibly think otherwise.”

He also shrugged off claims of “co-judging” by him and his clerk, writing, “my ruling are mine, and mine alone.”

The clerk has become such a target of criticism that Engoron has imposed gag orders barring both Trump and his lawyers from making comments about her. Trump has already violated the narrow gag order twice, receiving a total of $15,000 in fines.

A New York appeals judge on Thursday temporarily suspended those gag orders, citing the ”constitutional and statutory rights at issue.”

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Articles You May Like

Munis see positive start to 2H
WMATA issuing $625 million in significant regional deal
Starmer’s relegation of 31 Labour MPs and peers creates cohort of potential troublemakers
Biden tech hub funding plan has 12 grant winners
Unilever to slash a third of office jobs in Europe