Bonds

Parties in the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority bankruptcy asked the judge Wednesday for an extra month to negotiate a debt restructuring deal.

The Puerto Rico Oversight Board made the request on behalf of the the Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority, National Public Finance Guarantee, Assured Guaranty, Syncora Guarantee, Ad Hoc Group of PREPA Bondholders, Union de Trabajadores de la Industria Electrica y Riego (known as UTIER), the fuel line lenders, and the PREPA retirement system. 

According to board’s filing Wednesday, all parties except the Unsecured Creditors Committee support the extension request to July 1 from June 1. The mediation team also supports the extension.

The board said the UCC would be filing a motion explaining its opposition, which was not yet filed by publication. Luc Despins of Paul Hastings, the UCC’s lawyer, did not immediately respond to a request for a comment.

Despite the extension request, Oversight Board Member Justin Peterson said Wednesday he was confident parties would settle the PREPA bankruptcy by the end of the year. “It is long overdue.”

The deadline has already been extended. In early March Gov. Pedro Pierluisi had FAFAA withdraw support from a PREPA deal, thereby killing the deal and n March 8 bankruptcy Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the parties to try to develop a proposed plan of adjustment by May 2. 

On April 8, Swain extended the deadline to June 1 unless the mediation team supported a further deadline to July 1. According to the board, the mediation team is now supporting an extension.

The mediation covers more than $8 billion of bond debt and more than $700 million of unsecured fuel line loans, general unsecured claims, collective bargaining agreements, and unfunded PREPA pensions.

PREPA was put in Title III bankruptcy in summer 2017. There have been negotiations about the debt among at least some of the parties since at least summer 2015. 

Regardless of the date, Swain has said the parties need to submit a proposed plan of adjustment, a term sheet for the plan, a litigation schedule, or a “declaration and memorandum of law showing cause why the court should not consider dismissal of PREPA’s Title III case.”

Articles You May Like

Senators preview coming tax debate, SALT, housing, capital gains on table
This 38-year-old is financially independent with passive income. Here’s how he built a 7-figure real estate portfolio
August home sales drop more than expected, as prices set a new record
Your favorite stocks may soon be quoted in half-penny increments, which could cut trading costs
Top Wall Street analysts pick these dividend stocks for attractive returns